Facepalms incoming: WGs last Q&A.
Дата: 15.12.2017 10:23:09
brumbarr, on 14 December 2017 - 02:53 PM, said: Question: Can you confirm or deny that you are slowly
implementing the general ideas/concepts of the first sandbox test
regarding tank balance?Kayi4ek: I can deny it, the vision has changed. I can't say we are
not going to use some of the concepts, but most definitely not in
the full scope.
kurcatovium, on 14 December 2017 - 03:40 PM, said: You mean like... you know... chat and friend list?
Kayi4ek: You are Czech so you can czech the stream, because we've
been talking about it. The issue was, we didn't have enough
data. We didn't know what was the cause of the issues. In cases
like this I would like to appeal on all of you. If you spot issues
like this in the future, please report them to our customer
support, because it really helps us to find the solution. As
Miloš said, we've been working on the fix. It was our main
priority, but when you don't know where is the issue, it's really
hard to find the solution.
SovietBias, on 14 December 2017 - 09:10 PM, said: What are your plans for Obj 252U/Defender? Relevant sources
indicated it might struggle with TVP VTU, for instance. I suggest a
buff. After all, it's a clear case of not enough data on the
server ™.Kayi4ek: It was also mentioned in the stream. We don't want to touch
(nerf) premium tanks, because it would be unfair for the people who
paid for the tanks. I know you will mention Type 59 as an example,
but this happened years ago.
Cobra6, on 14 December 2017 - 09:48 PM, said: WG staff abandoned the thread as usual once there are only serious
questions left and they can't answer the "filler" questions anymore
Well, at least they were
here for a while answering stuff which is more than would happen
two years ago, so: "GG Well Played" I guess! Cobra 6Kayi4ek: No, WG staff just went home after really busy day. Please,
keep in mind that Minsk is in GMT +3 time zone. EDIT: Sorry
I missed the question.
Excavatus, on 15 December 2017 - 06:47 AM, said: Dear Mr. Developer, This is the third time I am gonna ask
the same simple question, I presume you missed the second one again
due to the high traffic of the thread. You said, as a
developer, that WG doesnt think that the Type 5 is "Game Breaking"
We as players have a very different opinion on that. It is
understandable that we can have different ideas about the game.
I just really like to understand the logic behind it, as WG
development team, "WHAT IS GAME BREAKING?" for you? can you give a
couple examples? even hypothechical or rhethorical onesKayi4ek: One example for all. Tier VIII matchmaking. That's why it's
one of our main priorities.
Facepalms incoming: WGs last Q&A.