Developers posts on forum

Subject: Spezialauftrag
Link on message: #6939857

SuicideMonkey, on 09 January 2014 - 07:01 PM, said: Danke fürs Gold aber was ist mit der versprochenen Medallie? ^^

Subject: Is it just LUCK?!
Link on message: #6939842

Subject: Ne Frage zum Teamkill
Link on message: #6939749

Kathanis, on 09 January 2014 - 07:46 PM, said: Meiner Erinnerung nach gab es irgend wann mal eine Anpassung - Splashschaden bei Schüssen, die auch einen Gegner treffen, werden nur teilweise als Teamschaden gewertet

Subject: bug enregisterment des replay
Link on message: #6939708

Subject: WoT i moje przemyslenia przy około 10k stoczonych bitew
Link on message: #6939429

Alcarin, on 09 January 2014 - 06:54 PM, said: Hm. Liczyłem na jakiś sensowny temat a wyszło jak zawsze. Ale ja stosunkowo nowy na forum jestem to mało widziałem...    Ponieważ jednak dyskusja jakaś się pojawiła to skorzystam z okazji i przedstawię wam moją teorię "Wajchy"    Powstała we współpracy z dwoma zależnymi od MM specjalistami. Zakłada ona, że do każdej bitwy przydzielany jest pracownik WG(ktoś wspomniał o tajniakach SerBa), który ma panel kontrolny z nazwami graczy w bitwie i obok każdego nicku ma taką wajchę. Zadaniem jego jest przestawianie tej wajchy w górę i w dół losowo. Pozycja w górę pozwala przebijać Mausa z HE na przedni pancerz a pozycja w dół... Rodzi takie tematy. Pracownicy jednak nie stosują się do założeń ich pracy i w wyniku paskudnej zmowy działają z premedytacją na niekorzyść nieświadomych istnienia tego systemu graczy.    Jak myślicie? Jakie są wasze odczucia? Czy ta teoria może być prawdziwa?     P.S. Tak to jest troll. Ale ja dopiero zaczynam, gdzie mi tak do światowego poziomu 

Subject: There are may "top gun" threads but this one is mine
Link on message: #6939194

Subject: #2 - Pour les gros titres !
Link on message: #6939056

Subject: Lt. Hiroo Onoda & the Japanese holdouts.
Link on message: #6939001

Subject: #3 - MEMEorisez-nous !
Link on message: #6938990

jarran29, on 09 January 2014 - 02:10 PM, said: Je ne comprends pas : on doit faire un MEME avec avion, tank et navire? Ou juste faire une référence à chaque univers mais illustrer avec l'image qui correspond au jeu ciblé? Genre un tank pour WoT, et un avion pour WoWp?   Sinon, autant poster le même pour les deux concours...

Subject: Experiment "Historisch korrekt"
Link on message: #6938951

Subject: Contest #3: MEMEmber Us, 9th - 12th January
Link on message: #6938909

ThierryN, on 09 January 2014 - 02:44 PM, said: WTF   IT IS A WARGAME, AND ONLY THE PLAYERS WHO KNOW HOW TO MAKE PICS LIKE THAT CAN BE IN THIS EVENT, PFFFFFFF.   NEXT EVENT, DO GAME PLAY, THIS IS NOT FUN.   GREAT EVENT WG FOOLS  

Subject: Spieler im Gefecht, aber Konto existiert nicht?
Link on message: #6938866

Chrom_Valium, on 09 January 2014 - 05:08 PM, said: War mein erster Kontakt mit so etwas und war etwas verwundert. ^^  Danke, kann dann close. 

Subject: Spieler im Gefecht, aber Konto existiert nicht?
Link on message: #6938790

Chrom_Valium, on 09 January 2014 - 06:01 PM, said: Möchte mir den Wehrpass von Spieler WoT_810_2  im Game ansehen.     Hatte ich ja noch nie. Schau mer mal über die Website.     Klicke ich nun auf das Konto, ...     Habe jetzt extra ein paar Minuten gewartet, damit der Server die Daten updaten kann. Kein einziges dieser Konten existiert. 

Subject: Ne Frage zum Teamkill
Link on message: #6938772

feindbild, on 09 January 2014 - 04:55 PM, said: Danke für die Antworten. Damit währe die frage nach dem Blau werden Beantwortet. Aber generell wird Arty bei Teamkill auch blau oder ?.  

Subject: Gra Orkiestra!
Link on message: #6938753

12312319873, on 09 January 2014 - 04:58 PM, said: 12 grudnia  ;) chyba stycznia ;)

Subject: Gra Orkiestra!
Link on message: #6938668

Andzio121, on 09 January 2014 - 04:45 PM, said: O cześć Cmd_Latina :) Wgl takie osoby jak wy grają w plutonach ? :)

Subject: 3 z 10
Link on message: #6938557

Subject: Die IS-6 Hauptgewinn Selbsthilfegruppe.
Link on message: #6938484

yallinho, on 09 January 2014 - 05:03 PM, said: D mit Nashorn und JP4 beendet, UDSSR mit KV1s beendet, CHN mit Type-58 beendet, USA mit Dailys auf M18, M44, Easy2 und Easy8 beendet, GB mit Cromwell und Churchill 7 (*kotz*) beendet JAP bei 95k mit, na klar, dem Chi-To (je mehr Gefechte, desto besser gefiel er mir) und F bei 43k auf dem ARL44.

Subject: Is it just LUCK?!
Link on message: #6938227

bushwacker001, on 09 January 2014 - 04:52 PM, said: A hunch tells me you should have kept quiet about this 

Subject: Know Your Steel: The M-84 tank
Link on message: #6938156

deveen23, on 09 January 2014 - 04:29 PM, said:   You mentioned it yourself earlier, the tank was in the prototype phase some 15 years ago. That's a long period of time in this day and age, with technology running forward and with all other issues, including qualified personnel. Now, I guess you can address many issues by cooperating with others like the Israelis or the Germans, but then again, they also have their own products to offer on the market.   As for the production, I'm afraid the factory can do the final assembly, with maybe some other domestic companies offering software related solutions, but everything else would have to be imported. While it is feasible to do so, it doesn't offer the incentive to do it as much as it would offer in the case of many domestic companies producing parts (which was the case in Yugoslavia when M-84 was mass produced). You can argue that it makes sense to do it nevertheless because you retain the know-how, but that takes the back seat to hard economics.   If you look at the big picture, main buyers for any kind of upgrade would have to be Croatian and Serbian armies. That market is split in two, with different companies from respective countries offering upgrade packages, with political reasons making it impossible for one company to clean the entire market. That leaves you with practically one army as your customer, with both armies having more urgent needs like new fighters, small arms, ATGMs etc. and export possibilities largely reduced due to bigger players.    

Subject: Know Your Steel: The M-84 tank
Link on message: #6938156

deveen23, on 09 January 2014 - 04:29 PM, said:   You mentioned it yourself earlier, the tank was in the prototype phase some 15 years ago. That's a long period of time in this day and age, with technology running forward and with all other issues, including qualified personnel. Now, I guess you can address many issues by cooperating with others like the Israelis or the Germans, but then again, they also have their own products to offer on the market.   As for the production, I'm afraid the factory can do the final assembly, with maybe some other domestic companies offering software related solutions, but everything else would have to be imported. While it is feasible to do so, it doesn't offer the incentive to do it as much as it would offer in the case of many domestic companies producing parts (which was the case in Yugoslavia when M-84 was mass produced). You can argue that it makes sense to do it nevertheless because you retain the know-how, but that takes the back seat to hard economics.   If you look at the big picture, main buyers for any kind of upgrade would have to be Croatian and Serbian armies. That market is split in two, with different companies from respective countries offering upgrade packages, with political reasons making it impossible for one company to clean the entire market. That leaves you with practically one army as your customer, with both armies having more urgent needs like new fighters, small arms, ATGMs etc. and export possibilities largely reduced due to bigger players.    

Subject: Wettbewerb #3 - MEMEmber Us!
Link on message: #6938058

Cella_Dei, on 09 January 2014 - 02:12 PM, said: jaja, ich weiß ja dass ich alt bin, aber war zur hölle ist ein MEME??? wikipedia --> einen Bezirk in der Region Sud-Ouest von Kamerun wikipedie2 --> Als Internet-Phänomen (auch Internet-Hype) wird ein Konzept in Form eines Links oder einer Bild-, Ton- oder Videodatei bezeichnet, das sich schnell über das Internet verbreitet. Die am weitesten verbreitete Unterform ist das Mem(e). soll heißen, einfach n bild, dass u.u. viele teilen könnten?? versteh ich das grad richtig?

Subject: Premium Konto -46%
Link on message: #6938049

Subject: Is it just LUCK?!
Link on message: #6938035

Subject: TD nerf?
Link on message: #6937880

Vamiris, on 09 January 2014 - 04:28 PM, said:   Die Frage ist, was normal heißt.
Der Schnitt von der Arty ist bei 1275 DMG. Ich könnte jetzt sagen: "Juhu ich bin besser :D"
  Im Verhältnis zu anderen Klassen ist er vllt. gering, doch das sehe ich allgemein bei der Arty so. Laut VBaddict schießt da keine Arty im DMG einen Heavy des gleich Tiers raus.
Ich bin einfach nie mit dem Gedanken ran zu gehen, der Killer mit Arty zu sein. Ich sollte doch eher unterstüzen und Ketten ziehen, Druck aufbauen etc.

Subject: Gra Orkiestra!
Link on message: #6937531

cleophas3, on 09 January 2014 - 02:58 PM, said: nie zaufany sprzedawca. ma zero pozytywów i znowu bezie jak z goldem z allegro. odradzam

Subject: Know Your Steel: The M-84 tank
Link on message: #6937477

deveen23, on 09 January 2014 - 03:52 PM, said:   Kuwait didn't buy Degman, or upgraded their M-84s yet.     I don't think we'll ever see even M-84D in active service, let alone M-95. Some of the reasons you state yourself, military industry is much more about politics then money itself. Then there is a question of actual ability to build such a sophisticated product like a MBT. With old M-84 you had many different factories producing parts, many of which are gone. I guess you can go with other suppliers, but it's not as easy as it seems.   There's also a conceptual issue as well, modern small armies usually don't invest heavily in tanks. You might even argue about the concept of MBT being obsolete in modern warfare. If you don't have a strong export market, it becomes very questionable if the price can be justified.   I would say that the best chance for all these proposed upgrades might not be M-84 itself, but actually T-72, considering how many are there around the world. Upgrade packages could be relatively cheap option for many armies to keep their equipment out of obsolescence. Then again, I'd imagine Russia, Ukraine and some other former Soviet Union countries make for strong competition there, both political and economic.

Subject: Know Your Steel: The M-84 tank
Link on message: #6937477

deveen23, on 09 January 2014 - 03:52 PM, said:   Kuwait didn't buy Degman, or upgraded their M-84s yet.     I don't think we'll ever see even M-84D in active service, let alone M-95. Some of the reasons you state yourself, military industry is much more about politics then money itself. Then there is a question of actual ability to build such a sophisticated product like a MBT. With old M-84 you had many different factories producing parts, many of which are gone. I guess you can go with other suppliers, but it's not as easy as it seems.   There's also a conceptual issue as well, modern small armies usually don't invest heavily in tanks. You might even argue about the concept of MBT being obsolete in modern warfare. If you don't have a strong export market, it becomes very questionable if the price can be justified.   I would say that the best chance for all these proposed upgrades might not be M-84 itself, but actually T-72, considering how many are there around the world. Upgrade packages could be relatively cheap option for many armies to keep their equipment out of obsolescence. Then again, I'd imagine Russia, Ukraine and some other former Soviet Union countries make for strong competition there, both political and economic.

Subject: Do you know Tanks?
Link on message: #6937435

StronkTenkererGuderian, on 09 January 2014 - 12:30 PM, said: A7V.


interpol, on 09 January 2014 - 12:39 PM, said:
Because I did not see the answer yet... Object 142, right?

Subject: Do you know Tanks?
Link on message: #6937435

StronkTenkererGuderian, on 09 January 2014 - 12:30 PM, said: A7V.


interpol, on 09 January 2014 - 12:39 PM, said:
Because I did not see the answer yet... Object 142, right?

Subject: Diffrent kinds of hits and what they do?
Link on message: #6937362

Subject: Question : multi compte
Link on message: #6937194

Subject: Starting a youtube channel with the aim to help new players out.
Link on message: #6937117

Tankformer, on 09 January 2014 - 03:12 PM, said: Hi Really appreciate the side scraping video, I’ve read a lot about it but not quite managed to angle it right. It’s very helpful to see it, I’ve been getting the angle all wrong and going the wrong way making myself more vulnerable not less.   One suggestion, I don’t know it its possible but I watched the sidescraping video then the T34 tier 8 premium tank guide (no where near it but was interested in seeing another video after enjoying the first). The T34 was really quiet, I had to really turn up the sound which meant getting really loud volume when I watched my next video.   As the KV1 is the most communally recommended tank I’ve seen for new players to learn on I’d suggest a video on that would prove very popular.   Personally I’d enjoy seeing some Tier 3 videos as the jump in difficulty is huge and I need all the help I can get, shots bounce off, I don’t know the maps at all, or what my role is depending on where I am in the list. Possibly the T46 as its on the way to the KV1.

Subject: Know Your Steel: The M-84 tank
Link on message: #6937068

Mad_MakS, on 09 January 2014 - 03:06 PM, said:   Yes, it will be replaced. But at the moment they still have their 125`s mounted. That project is of Swiss gun is on waiting list for years. Reportedly, it demands another firing control (to replace OMEGA which actually makes them great) and the turret also, due to entire system swap.  Expensive investment for a tank that is sitting as 2-model prototype for 18 years...  I think it will fail eventually, because of politics,strong Import interests in Croatia, or the stifled industry itself (specially in Djakovich factory). Never the less,  NATO will have the last decision unfortunately, even if our production ever sees the daylight.

Subject: Know Your Steel: The M-84 tank
Link on message: #6937068

Mad_MakS, on 09 January 2014 - 03:06 PM, said:   Yes, it will be replaced. But at the moment they still have their 125`s mounted. That project is of Swiss gun is on waiting list for years. Reportedly, it demands another firing control (to replace OMEGA which actually makes them great) and the turret also, due to entire system swap.  Expensive investment for a tank that is sitting as 2-model prototype for 18 years...  I think it will fail eventually, because of politics,strong Import interests in Croatia, or the stifled industry itself (specially in Djakovich factory). Never the less,  NATO will have the last decision unfortunately, even if our production ever sees the daylight.

Subject: Wieso ist sowas erlaubt?
Link on message: #6936881

Subject: World of Tanks 2013 Summary
Link on message: #6936827

dysje, on 09 January 2014 - 02:25 PM, said: I can remember the day the KV-1S was considered a bad tank, how things change. Well, the KV-1S didn't change, the game around it did.

Subject: World of Tanks 2013 Summary
Link on message: #6936827

dysje, on 09 January 2014 - 02:25 PM, said: I can remember the day the KV-1S was considered a bad tank, how things change. Well, the KV-1S didn't change, the game around it did.

Subject: Bräuchte mal Rat
Link on message: #6936799

Subject: Idée Trombinoscope
Link on message: #6936736