Easy Vehicles for Ranked Battles
Дата: 20.05.2019 03:25:10
RedlineSnieperTom, on 18 May 2019 - 02:37 PM, said: You are right, the definition of easy to play differs per player.
However, in general we can conclude that tanks without too much
armor harder to play because you get punished for your own
stupidity. This is why I think Patton for example is not a easy to
play tank for casual players, as it is described in the
article. Berbo: I agree what you said in your first sentence 
However, for the second one I have
proofs which say that Patton is not THAT difficult to play. I was
thinking exactly what you were thinking but trust me, people don't
find it hard to play at least in ranked. Same is with S Conq,
appears to be difficult due to lack of armor, engine
issues etc but performs well anyway. In any case, what
we all can conclude is we all have specific play styles
and if you play well, you'll do well with any tank and vice
versa. My recommendation would be to limit yourself to max 2 tanks
and only play those if you're planning to rank up. I'll probably
play something like 5A, 113, Is7. Cheers
However, for the second one I have
proofs which say that Patton is not THAT difficult to play. I was
thinking exactly what you were thinking but trust me, people don't
find it hard to play at least in ranked. Same is with S Conq,
appears to be difficult due to lack of armor, engine
issues etc but performs well anyway. In any case, what
we all can conclude is we all have specific play styles
and if you play well, you'll do well with any tank and vice
versa. My recommendation would be to limit yourself to max 2 tanks
and only play those if you're planning to rank up. I'll probably
play something like 5A, 113, Is7. CheersEasy Vehicles for Ranked Battles