Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Dance - Can you please start a feedback thread for the new July tourneys?

Дата: 15.07.2016 23:09:35
View PostA_FIELD_MARSHAL, on Jul 15 2016 - 12:36, said:   But I thought Gold wasnt the issue as you yourself has said? You said this in the other thread     Can you PLEASE be honest. The one thing I hate in life is Liars. 
This is why the NA Server is dying is due to lies being made at the top. If you said at the start of this that we been giving out too much gold I would of accepted it. But saying one thing and then saying the oppsite shows it was about the gold this whole time.    Can you please give the honest TRUTH. Was it about the Gold or not.   

dance210: I said that the schedule change wasn't due to gold, and it wasn't. The schedule change was because my boss wanted to see what would happen if fewer tournaments were run. There was also supposed to be another part to it, that for whatever reason wasn't able to happen (and no, I'm not happy about that or that I can't get the final prize for the Summer Play tournament finalized...).   The gold was a global decree and all regions were hit. EU has a top prize for a one day tournament of 250 gold; RU has a group stage into playoffs with a 1st place prize of 1,500 gold. I'm trying really hard to keep them from looking at NA and thinking those prizes should come here.   The honest truth is I have never lied to you guys. Yes, there are times I can't tell you everything - my job doesn't allow me to tell you everything. I will tell you what I can, when I can. Sometimes, those things change and I can't always update you on those changes. I am trying to give you as many tournaments as I can and give out the most that I can.   To answer your first question, no they will not be returning. Why? Because someone has a new vision for how tournaments should work, and how the previous tournaments were run no longer fit the vision (or the new naming scheme that they want to go with) and honestly I would rather retire them than turn them into something else. If you mean will there be more one day and multi-day tournaments run during the month, hopefully at early and alter times, then the answer is yes.  

View PostHoneyRider, on Jul 15 2016 - 13:01, said: I don't have a problem with adjusting gold rewards in tourneys.  I work with budgets for a living.  If there is a finite amount to be spread among tourneys, then it behooves we as the consumer to provide feedback on how best to allot it.  We need to be constructive in this and partner WITH Dance.  It doesn't matter at this point if it was about the gold or not.  What matters is that we come out with a range of tournaments and competitive play that suits the majority of us and allows for growth on the server.  It benefits ALL of us if the amount of active players on the NA server grows steadily - matchmaking improves, team play improves, tourney participation increases........  I am just of the opinion that a range of tournaments that appeal to not just the best of the best can accomplish this.  I run a tourney clan and have been at this for a few years now.  Dance does a good job within the confines of the boundaries that she is given.  Flaming her for it does not help.   Dance - for Skirmishes  - the gold splits can be adjusted based on the budget you're given.  For example - instead of publishing the flat rate for placement prizes, you can do a simple percentage formula based on the amount of entrants divided into the prize pool and published once entrance is closed and group stage roster is posted.  It's still the same allotment for day gold, for example, but based on a percentage of the available prize pool.  That way you have control over gold budget.  The prize pool could be established based on number of entrants in relation to server population.  Would be an honour system on WG part to increase prize pool if it was successful in attracting player base, improving player retention and adding to revenue stream for WG. Most of the existing prizes in various tournaments have been top heavy to 1, 2, 3 placements for example.  I don't think anyone here would be unhappy with adjustments in that area.   I think it benefits all of us to establish and continue the dialogue in a reasonable manner.

dance210: I couldn't figure out a scaling prize structure for July because it needed to be designed over the 4th of July weekend. I'm hoping to have scaling prizes, where more teams equal more prizing (EU called them stretch goals). It's a matter of making sure I have all the kinks worked out, that it's understandable and that it gets approved.

Реклама | Adv