Does RNG really not exist for the Skirmish battle schedules?
Дата: 15.10.2014 23:52:39
SahintheFalcon, on Oct 15 2014 - 12:22, said: Really, WG? I thought this was fixed a while back. Guess not. I
mean, the fact of the matter is, it's encouraging teams to cheat
the sides with characters or Z's in their name. It's explicitly
against the rules, but I refuse to believe that there aren't a good
proportion of teams trying to game the system. Honestly,
after the stacked sides on the first day, I realized that side 1
was much better (at least for the strat I was running). This was
confirmed after the second day. So I was hoping that at the very
least, WG would make the third day balanced (or if anything, give
us more of side 1 as compensation). But nope.
[IMG]http://i.imgur.com/KZHXZqw.png[/IMG]dance210: You're right, it is against the rules to "game" the system,
which is why we reserve the right to change team names, even when
appropriate. They system seems to be picking sides randomly
now (e.g. no more teams starting with !! always getting side 1);
however, that doesn't mean that teams will be equally distributed
between sides 1 and 2. As an FYI, we doesn't "pick" which side a
team gets, that is all done automatically. Unfortunately, I
can't see the image that you tried to upload and I don't know your
team name to check manually. If you feel as though there is a
problem with this or any tournament, please feel free to PM me
directly and/or send an email to tournaments@wargamingamerica.com.
While I can't promise you'll always like my answer, I do read every
PM, either through the forums or via email. Edit:
Intelligent forum people...anyone know why I can see the picture in
the quoted post but not the OP.... 
Does RNG really not exist for the Skirmish battle schedules?