Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era
Дата: 16.08.2012 16:36:43
martingalindo, on Aug 15 2012 - 20:43, said: Yes this is my question, Why various tier10s don`t have different
view ranges?Vallter: Medium Tank M48A1 - 420 meters View Range
Medium Tank E-50 Ausf.M - 400m View Range
Medium Tank E-50 Ausf.M - 400m View Range
Death187, on Aug 15 2012 - 20:45, said: This does not sound too promising...What is the probability that we will not see buffs to them in the next patch?
If they are not buffed in the next patch would we have to wait for 8.1 or could there be a 8.0.1 fix patch for them?
Vallter: Everything depends on results of Public Test. Without them we
cannot give any certain details.
Cuth, on Aug 15 2012 - 20:52, said: Oh, another question just came to mind: Will battles ever be
expanded beyond 15v15?Vallter: This feature was transferred to 'Development Hell' and we do not
when will we start implementing it. And we even are not sure
whether it's required.
Maus123, on Aug 15 2012 - 21:07, said: 1. Will you ever put a different stock turret on the ARL 44, I
don't think having the FCM F1 turret on it is a good idea. I also
found 2 turrets that make way more sense on it2. What version of the Char 2C will we get, the version with 90mm of front armor or the one with 40mm? What tier will it be at?
3. When physics come out will it come with working suspensions?
4. When physics come out will some tanks have an easier time going over stuff, like it will be easier for the Churchill to go over some obstacles due to it's multiple bogie suspension, or the B1 is good at going over ditches
5. Will the B1 ter ever be included?
Vallter: 1)We are not thinking about adding another turret.
2)It's still a way too early to speak about it. We won't introduce it before completing British Tree most probably.
3)Yes it will, but we are probably speaking about different effects. I mean worse maneuverability on rocks, ice and other surfaces.
4)We will tweak passability parameters according to the sake of gameplay. So it depends on tests.
5)Sorry, have not fully understood you.
2)It's still a way too early to speak about it. We won't introduce it before completing British Tree most probably.
3)Yes it will, but we are probably speaking about different effects. I mean worse maneuverability on rocks, ice and other surfaces.
4)We will tweak passability parameters according to the sake of gameplay. So it depends on tests.
5)Sorry, have not fully understood you.
turtle722, on Aug 16 2012 - 00:32, said: What ever happend to WOT Weekly? Loved that thing.Vallter: You should ask player who made it and not Developers of the game.
Hitty40, on Aug 16 2012 - 00:47, said: A few days ago, I read a thread about giving free players the right
to create junior tank companies, and it made me wonder why no one
has thought of it before. What is WG's stand on this?Vallter: 1)What do you mean about free players? Is there any kind of slavery
in World of Tanks?
2)A privilegue to create TC's will be reserved to users with PA.
2)A privilegue to create TC's will be reserved to users with PA.
Smedlee, on Aug 16 2012 - 02:54, said: Why does the US tier III medium tank have less armor and hit points
than the US tier III light tank?Vallter: This is done to safe the in-game balance. Some explanations were
already posted above by another player.
P0WERWAG0N, on Aug 16 2012 - 06:08, said: will the team damage compensation be fixed? i'vr been in battles
were someone has intentionally shot me, heavy damage. only hit i
took all battle. my repair bill was $5K and my compensation was
$300.Vallter: Player do not receive full compensation to keep compensation system
away from delibarate violators. The person, who's tank has caused
team damage, receives greater fine. Also it counts several
paramaters to estimate, whether it was intentional or now.
Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era