T110 and M103 feedback topic
Дата: 19.03.2012 12:32:54
socomseal, on Mar 16 2012 - 16:53, said: There is no reason to play the M103 or T110. They can't do
anything. They have incredibly weak side armour, and weak rear
armour. Their frontal armour is not that impressive, and neither
can hull down effectively. Neither of these tanks offer anything
over their competitors.All I am asking for from the M103 and T110, is a tank with frontal armour that is good enough to reliably bounce a tier 8 shell at range. And a turret that can withstand just about anything frontally, so that the tank can hull down better than any of the other competitors. And have a gun with decent accuracy, and penetration. I don't think I am asking for too much. I just want a competitive tank, not an over powered tank. I want a tank that would give the American heavies a place in clan wars, as a hull down defensive, high pen gun tank.
Vallter: T95 has very low side armour too. I don't think it makes it a bad
Tank Destroyer.
World of Tanks Game Discussion\Testing Grounds (7.2 Public Test )\T110 and M103 feedback topic













