Planes, Trains and T110s
Дата: 12.10.2019 08:10:51
PrimarchRogalDorn, on Oct 11 2019 - 22:20, said: Isn't it the lower of an AR-15 the part that's considered the
"firearm" legally?The_Chieftain:
It’s the “legally” bit which is causing the problem. It is how ATF regulates them, and we have been working on that basis for decades. Apparently, however, up until recently, nobody actually bothered to look up the laws the regulations are based on. This goes back to the challenge in the previous post. What part of an AR15 meets the legal definition of “receiver”, given the ATF regulates receivers?
It’s the “legally” bit which is causing the problem. It is how ATF regulates them, and we have been working on that basis for decades. Apparently, however, up until recently, nobody actually bothered to look up the laws the regulations are based on. This goes back to the challenge in the previous post. What part of an AR15 meets the legal definition of “receiver”, given the ATF regulates receivers?
Planes, Trains and T110s