Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

T110's Sixth Summer of Love and Tolerance

Дата: 20.06.2018 22:49:43
View PostKilljoyCutter, on Jun 20 2018 - 13:52, said:   I'm still in favor of mandatory open primaries for all federal-level elected offices.    Yes, it means that some districts will have November ballots where the two candidates are hard-left and center-left, or hard-right and center-right, and the "opposite" hard-X won't have a candidate on the ballot -- but then the voters from the "unrepresented" edge have a choice between voting for the moderate, or voting for the opposing hardliner.   Combine this with a mandatory nationwide primary date, in say August, such that there's less time for the candidates to dash from their "appeal to the base" message to their "appeal to the electorate" message.    This would immediately favor the moderate candidates who can pull voters from a broader swath of the electorate, and who stand in contrast to the hardliners.   

The_Chieftain:   Only works to a point, i’m afraid. In California, Newsom (Very D) successfully orchestrated that his opponent in the runoff in California was a Republican, Cox. Indeed, survey says about a third of Cox’s voters didn’t plan on voting for him in the General, they only wanted to make sure that Newsom didn’t have moderate D opposition. So, Newsom is a walk-in for Governor now. Of course, the end result is no worse than the old system, but it’s not a complete fix like the transferable vote/ranked choice would be. Realistically, what the Rs need to do is accept their losses until they reinvent themselves and their candidates to become more appealing in California, not run anyone at all, and instruct the R base to vote for whichever D moderate seems most viable. Also realistically, however, there is no chance of their doing it.   As for the tank drone, I think we are a long way from viable unmanned tanks. There is no substitute for human eye judgement when determining terrain feasibility, the ‘sense’ that track is about to walk off, or the ability to quickly self recover if the estimate is in error.  

Реклама | Adv