T110's Second Century of Civilised Comfort
Дата: 23.11.2016 04:15:08
Avalon304, on Nov 23 2016 - 00:09, said: 1. How? The new system seems completely unintuitive from my
perspective. 2. I can only imagine when you speak of the
"design purpose of thin, highly-sloped armor" you speak about it in
reference to real life. And yes. The current rule would does
invalidate real life armor design... but thats ok because as
Wargaming occasionally likes to point out WoT is a video game and
if you want realism you should go join the army. No one
wants to rely on a bad game mechanic (arty) to help them because
its a worse RNG slot machine that an actual slot machine and
players (good players especially) are capable of realizing that
they need to maneuver to get better shots. I dont rely on the
overmatch rule to pen shots unless I have no other recourse (a hull
down IS-3 at the end of a corridor that I cant extricate myself
from, for instance). But in these new mechanics? The IS-3 is
invulnerable if is gun is pointed at me. 3. A few? Every
vehicle in the game from tier 5 and up is going to need to be
looked at. Thats more than a few. Its a bad change being
made for 3 or 4 new vehicles. This is a change I would have
expected to see being suggested on sandbox, along with every other
bad idea that was floated on that server. Youre introducing more
complexity in a place where it isnt needed. And until anyone
can explain to me how this new system is simpler than ">3x means
auto pen", Im gonna keep saying that, because if it looks like a
duck and quacks like a duck its probably an AMX-40.The_Chieftain: 1) Something is intuitive if someone who has never played
the game before or looked up the rules can still get a sense as to
how it's supposed to work. The current x2 normalisation boost, x3
overmatch,and 'autobounce angle' rules are the sorts of things
which you could only know if you actually looked them up. Your
typical casual player who may know some basics about how tanks
work, however, will probably understand from the beginning the
general concept of "Armor works better the more it presents a
shallow angle to the projectile, while projectiles are more likely
to get through any particular piece of armor if they are bigger, or
more powerful than other projectiles." That's what the new rules
should put into effect. 2) Well, I guess you need to try to
avoid getting caught without support in a die-in-place position
against an IS-3 in future. 3) I'm not as convinced by that
as you are. Let's leave it at that, shall we?
Slayer_Jesse, on Nov 23 2016 - 00:29, said: id still go AFT just so you have a better chance at self
defense against aircraft.The_Chieftain: My Minotaur eats airplanes almost as well as my Des Moines.
T110's Second Century of Civilised Comfort