Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Patton Troubles

Дата: 07.03.2016 20:37:39
View Postcscottyd, on Mar 07 2016 - 18:17, said:   If I remember correctly, most modern American tanks turn shorter to the right (so... clockwise, i  think). And, I believe this is the result, in part, to the vehicle having a shorter track on the right side. My Troop's BFVs usually had, on average, two less track shoes on the right track. This was also true in my experience with the M113 family of vehicles and the tankers said that their M1A2s were the same way as well.   I do not know the true reason for the shorter track but I have heard some pretty interesting ones...    ...because of the torsion bar suspension configuration. ...because of the difference in the torque from the transmission to the final drives.   And probably one of the best things I heard out of a soldier's mouth...   ...so that the vehicle pulls to the right to prevent running into oncoming traffic during road marches if the driver dozes off!

The_Chieftain:   Torsion bar is correct. If you look at the Bradley or Abrams, you'll see that one roadhweel is further forward than the other, resulting in a shorter overall track length on the other side, because that side can 'cut the corner.' However, it's not a given. Abrams is 78 track links per side (when new tracks are installed: As the track stretches, one link can be removed without a requirement to remove one on the other side). Then again, the angle of the run from the idler to the near arm is much shallower than that of the Bradley or M113, so the corner-cut isn't as pronounced.    

Реклама | Adv