T110's Unrequited Valentine
Дата: 29.02.2016 19:47:16
Avalon304, on Feb 29 2016 - 08:20, said: Yea, but if you want invisitorping why wouldnt you just go
the IJN line and be able to invisitorp from tier 4 or 5. Similarly,
if you want gun boats, the RU DDs offer a better experience from
the beginning. Being a Jack of all trades isnt something suited to
a class with relatively low survivability. Like unless you
want the Benson for ranked battles, and didnt buy the Lo Yang, or
you really like a particularl USN DD, I cant see any reason to play
the USN line over either of the other two.The_Chieftain: That's if you want to do nothing but invisitorp. Further,
just because you want to invisitorp does not mean that the
opposition doesn't have a vote. They are absolutely dependent
on the enemy team playing on your terms to be effective. Don't get
me wrong, I respect the hell out of the Japanese DDs, but I don't
fear them the way I do the American or Soviet ones. I look at the
splash screen, count how many IJN DDs I see, and that's me counting
'targets to kill', as opposed to, say a Soviet one which is "Thing
I need to kill really damned quickly if I want to survive."
US vessels, and to a point Soviet ones provide a lot more
flexibility and the ability to adapt to changing situations.
TotallynotSS, on Feb 29 2016 - 12:10, said: So. Today it is one year working for AW. They offered me to renew
the contract. After a LOT of thinking... I accepted. I am
actually surprised at myself I did, during the weekend I was pretty
convinced otherwise. Gonna make a post on FTR.The_Chieftain: Congrats. Sometimes one need to look a little more than
'what is it like right now?' There's a reason I didn't bail to AW
like some of the other guys from the NA office, I saw greater
long-term potential despite the issues (then) currently ongoing.
Plus there's a little loyalty to the company which gave me this
pretty cool new direction in life.
TotallynotSS, on Feb 29 2016 - 15:46, said: Cutland as a military history expert. What could possibly go
wrong.The_Chieftain: I didn't see much wrong with it, actually. I could be
jealous and say that some articles recently have indicated that
he's the only military historian we have, but that's just
journalistic editing. Maybe if we do a Battle of the Bulge one or
some such, we can even the balance a bit for the American side of
the house 
T110's Unrequited Valentine