Players who kill teammates because they're blue.
Дата: 27.01.2016 09:47:06
lonezewolf, on Jan 26 2016 - 13:08, said: So your saying, if you was blue and the team tks you, would
you be upset?The_Chieftain: If I hadn't done anything to anyone that match? Yes, yes I
would. And I would be equally upset were I another green player and
I saw an ally remove a blue from my team if he hadn't done anything
to us.
badperson, on Jan 27 2016 - 05:46, said: Utterly specious argument. Just as absurd as your
belief in Lakeville Valley pushes. The blue player has a
special status allowing him to be TK'd without penalty. He
also is visibly marked for his teammates to know that he can be
TK'd without penalty, and also for them to be alerted that he is a
threat. If the "intent of the programming" wasn't to put that
choice in the hands of the teammates, it wouldn't be programmed
that way. Unless you believe that lines of code can have
ontological "intent". And that they are somehow being
misunderstood by those awful end users who just don't get it.The_Chieftain: Code has no intent. But the coders do. Think about
this for a second. For what possible reason would the developers
have coded a system which encourages a team to be short handed? If
you postulate that the developers believe that anyone who starts a
game blue should be shot on sight, then you are postulating that
they believe that it is fair in the fourteen other people on that
team to be forced to fight a game short handed because of the
actions of someone they never meant. And it's not as
if the developers couldn't come up with a system which prevents a
player from being part of a team. They did. It's the mechanism for
auto bans which takes effect when someone TKs too much. Put
frankly, you're letting your sense of vigilante justice get the
better of you.
Players who kill teammates because they're blue.