Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Super Pershing 9.8 Armor tests. (vs. IS-6, T32, Tiger II, IS-3)

Дата: 13.05.2015 03:07:54
View PostAmberpaw, on May 12 2015 - 16:41, said:   yep.....actually does anyone know why american tanks like pershing, super p, and t32 have the front half of side armor stronger than rear half?   was it to counter the engine weight (though seems the tanks would still be leading forward due to the frontal armor/ turret weight. plus the gun....   anyone know the reason o.0 cause i can't honestly believe the front and rear are remotely closely balanced even with the engine...

The_Chieftain:   Partially to protect the crew, and partially also, I believe, because they expect it's more likely to get hit. Even today's M1 tank has more armour on the front three skirts than the back four.

Реклама | Adv