NATO Survey, 1943 Pt 2

The_Chieftain: I don't know. I view O'Reilly as an entertainer. He makes a living by pandering to his audience, being way the hell out there. There is no need for his work for him to be doing any form of history book at all, it's way out of left field. I can only presume this is due to actually having a personal interest, a bit of a hobby. I've done a few hunts around for reviews on the book, and while I think it's safe to say that the whole conspiracy theory of the death is a bit off, and this is a view shared by most every reputable historian, there is nothing to indicate that they have any issues with the -facts- as opposed to the -conclusions- he holds. Kindof like Cooper's book, really.