Springtime for T110 and the Americas

FaustianQ, on Dec 08 2014 - 21:01, said:   There are some odd decisions regarding what gets included - for instance, the P-400 instead of the P-39D, the F86F-5 instead of an F86H-20. F84B has no real excuse to exist, the F80s are fine for tier and are actually better than the F-84B. Instead, they should have introduced the F-84E and F-84F.     Do you play arcade? Because the I-15 and I-16 are pretty bad outside off it. Yak-1 is OP for BR, it won't last.   America needs proper lower tier bombers with acceptable bomb loads.     They're actually better - less accurate, less able to use them as a scouting device. Further why waste time on artillery strikes when planes are better?     That's odd, that's significantly less than what Hunnicutt lists (221mm @ 30° @ 1000y). Sounds like different standards of testing then, would it be safe to assume that the Army rating is for full, complete penetration? This sounds like stricter criteria than what was used for the M62-T2 with BR-417D or even the Pak44 128mm.