Дата: 11.04.2021 18:20:30
Death_on_2_Treads, on Apr 11 2021 - 09:50, said: Or maybe, just maybe, they would like to have games not be
blowouts because teams are so uneven. To think they " want
more wins without working for them" is just silly. those players
would existing o both the losing and winning team, so your argument
is null and void. The reasons for SBMM are almost always to
make games more fair by even distribution of skill to avoid
lopsided matches. That doesn't necessarily translate into " free
wins". It translates into a good gaming experience. I don't like
blowouts win or lose. Its just not fun. Of course , if you are
only a good player because you can only beat up on lesser players
and would wither facing people of your own skill level on evenly
matched teams you probably don't like SBMM. That is the reason
95% of the people against SBMM don't want it. They are afraid
to lose their status in the game. I actually like the optional SBMM
idea. You know who doesn't like it. People like you. Maybe, just
maybe, YOUR pool of free wins would dry up.
TeriyakiTanker: How would optional SBMM work? Because it doesn't particularly
feasible. And why haven't you addressed Neatomans data that
shows almost no reduction in blowouts? Funny how people like
you just ignore the facts. Neatoman has shown, with data,
that SBMM would not have an appreciable effect on blowouts and more
importantly that blowouts are a result of the single death aspect
of the game. But you aren't going to address the facts are
you?