American Heavies: Speak loud now

SpectreHD, on Mar 24 2012 - 06:38, said: Sorry aw_man but you are living in a dream world. There have been COUNTLESS of civil posts by some of the more prominent players in the forums like FaustianQ and Onyx. Whether the fine primates (keepin' it classy) in Minsk would listen is a whole other story and with the release of the T110 and M103 based on their Test 3 stats, Minsk sure did listen!
But now the Test 3 M103 and T110 will be released and what are they missing?
T110
The T110 DOES NOT have -10 degree gun depression when the T110 project has specifically stated it was to have -10 degrees.
The T110 still reverses SLOWER than the Maus. Seriously, he have been fed lots of bravo sierra on how this 58ton vehicle would be highly mobile but it reverses SLOWER than a 188 ton tank?
The tumor cupola will already remove the T110's ability to hull down.
The 120mm is EXACTLY the same as the French one but does not have an autoloader. The 120mm on the M103 and T110 needs 280mm penetration since it loses MORE penetration over distance than the glorious 130mm S70.
M103
Has the weakest turret armour amongst all its peers and even FAR WORSE than on the T34. The IS-4 and E-75 can and WILL hull down far better than the M103.
Does not get the preferential treatment Soviet vehicles like the T-54 enjoy for its speed. Why exactly does the M103 not go the 37km/h speed the M103A3 has?
The M103 SHOULD get -10 degrees if the IS-4 can get its magical -8 depression with the 130mm S70 gun which would not even fit in the turret in the first place.
At the moment, the Soviet line enjoys FAR too many concessions to their balance while the US line gets balanced to historical spec or lower. Don't get me started on the butchered M10, M36 and M18.