US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements
Дата: 25.01.2011 23:05:26
Lobo, on 25 January 2011 - 10:44 AM, said: Ok it looks good. And with a good Balancing everything can get in.
BUT...T23 to M10 is wrong. M10 is on the hull of M4A3E2 as i see in photo, so it should be a possible spinoff from M4A3 and not from T23
I really like the idea of 2 tier passage from M24 and M41, M41 is damn great. But exp cost have to be damn HIGH to let you jump 1 tier.
T30 don't fit too well as M36 upgrade, in my opinion...
Jumbo Pershing should be good as passage to heavy line and not as T9 medium.
Couldn't find anything about T57, T110 and H3.
Can you please post a link
MrVic: Yeah might of got my connect point arrow a bit off 
M36 to T30 works purely since M36
was the end of a US TD doctrine so to speak. The US mainly was
focusing on Light Medium and Heavy with Tank destroyers being
considered in one of those roles. Tank destroyer after the M36 were
looked at in a 50-65 ton range designs. Every design sort of lead
to a turreted design and back into a MBT idea. Tho it took them a
good while to realize it. T30 was mainly a support gun role,
fortification destruction and heavy support. Tho they encompassed
engaging heavy German armor with them, they lacked a complete
package as a heavy.
T110 series is hard to dig up info on. Plus it also encompassed a number of different designs. The H3 never made it past concept design from records I have. They were also looking into 108 inch turret rings to greatly improve the turret slopes. Something the Russian tank designs were far ahead in adopting and using.
M36 to T30 works purely since M36
was the end of a US TD doctrine so to speak. The US mainly was
focusing on Light Medium and Heavy with Tank destroyers being
considered in one of those roles. Tank destroyer after the M36 were
looked at in a 50-65 ton range designs. Every design sort of lead
to a turreted design and back into a MBT idea. Tho it took them a
good while to realize it. T30 was mainly a support gun role,
fortification destruction and heavy support. Tho they encompassed
engaging heavy German armor with them, they lacked a complete
package as a heavy.T110 series is hard to dig up info on. Plus it also encompassed a number of different designs. The H3 never made it past concept design from records I have. They were also looking into 108 inch turret rings to greatly improve the turret slopes. Something the Russian tank designs were far ahead in adopting and using.
Archives\Beta\Suggestions\US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements