US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements
Дата: 19.12.2010 20:03:25
Kurt_Knispel, on 19 December 2010 - 04:20 PM, said: Yes, the M103 is not an actual improvement in raw armor value BUT
you have to remember this game engine does factor in slope. The
T29/T30 design is relatively slab-sided. The IS-7 is actually not
that heavily armored either, but because it's layout is more
advanced when you hit it from almost any angle you're hitting a
pretty drastic slope. This is why I've been pushing for the M103
since way back in the RCBT. Comparing raw numbers will not balance
the game. Also the fact that I have reason to believe Conqueror
will be the pinnacle of the UK tree makes the M103's absence all
the more confusing.MrVic: Yeah the slopes and respectable armor will give it a fighting
chance. Plus it has good speed and mobility.
Calculating effective due to slopes you get pretty close to the following.
Slopes all provide a good deflection surface
Upper Front Effective 150mm
Lower Front Effective 143mm
Side Effective 80mm
Rear Effective 76mm
Turret Gun Shield Effective 250mm to 143mm
Turret Front Effective 170mm
Turret side Effective 190mm to 212mm
Turret Rear Effective 80mm
Calculating effective due to slopes you get pretty close to the following.
Slopes all provide a good deflection surface
Upper Front Effective 150mm
Lower Front Effective 143mm
Side Effective 80mm
Rear Effective 76mm
Turret Gun Shield Effective 250mm to 143mm
Turret Front Effective 170mm
Turret side Effective 190mm to 212mm
Turret Rear Effective 80mm
Archives\Beta\Suggestions\US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements













