Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements

Дата: 19.12.2010 20:03:25
View PostKurt_Knispel, on 19 December 2010 - 04:20 PM, said: Yes, the M103 is not an actual improvement in raw armor value BUT you have to remember this game engine does factor in slope. The T29/T30 design is relatively slab-sided. The IS-7 is actually not that heavily armored either, but because it's layout is more advanced when you hit it from almost any angle you're hitting a pretty drastic slope. This is why I've been pushing for the M103 since way back in the RCBT. Comparing raw numbers will not balance the game. Also the fact that I have reason to believe Conqueror will be the pinnacle of the UK tree makes the M103's absence all the more confusing.

MrVic: Yeah the slopes and respectable armor will give it a fighting chance. Plus it has good speed and mobility.
Calculating effective due to slopes you get pretty close to the following.
Slopes all provide a good deflection surface :)
Upper Front Effective 150mm
Lower Front Effective 143mm
Side Effective 80mm
Rear Effective 76mm
Turret Gun Shield Effective 250mm to 143mm
Turret Front Effective 170mm
Turret side Effective 190mm to 212mm
Turret Rear Effective 80mm

Реклама | Adv