US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements
Дата: 18.12.2010 20:39:05
PzGrenKdr, on 18 December 2010 - 11:21 AM, said: great thoughs MrVic i hope this will become real.But the M26 Pershing shouldn´t get the 105mm T5E2, it´s too strong compared with the 100/122mm and the 88mm L/71. The 90mm T15E1 should be improved a bit and than used as end-gun(this would be the Super-Pershing!).
Also the T32 is a improved Super-Pershing(so it have to be above the Super-Pershing), it used a uparmoured and longer Pershing hull, 1st turret is a Pershing turret and the 90mm T15E1 is the Super-Pershing gun.
> No extra Super-Pershing because upgraded Pershing is a Super-Pershing and the T32 is the successor(maybe link between Pershing line and T32).
MrVic: The M26 pershing was in development and had met delays. The
ordnance board put out a request to build a heavy tank based on and
around as many pershing parts as they could. This mainly was due to
the pershing originally being seen as a heavy and then realizing it
was a medium in performance (note later retro fitted armor moved it
back towards the heavy category) The T32 was sister to the pershing
but in different design with similar parts (but they look very
similar). With the engine compartment being expanded but not
reworked enough to incorporate a large engine power plant it was
shelved, along with a number of minor problems. Also the T29/T30
program was thought to produce a better alternative so it was never
taken past prototype stages, and some of the design features were
used later in the M26 variants and in the T43(M103) project.
Archives\Beta\Suggestions\US Tech Tree Changes And Improvements