Changes to Vehicles With Preferential Matchmaking + Notes on Trade-in

ThatTrafficCone, on May 22 2018 - 03:00, said: Bless you, KRZYB00P, for communicating with us. Sorry things can't always be constructive from our end, but some of us try.    By chance did you catch my post on Page 2? I'm in favor of changing up the KV-5, but I think these preliminary stats are taking the tank in the wrong direction, turning it into something generic. The KV-5 is an awkward and dumb tank by design; don't take that away, but instead I think you guys should double-down on its more iconic aspects.


The_Real_Black_Knight, on May 22 2018 - 03:03, said: SOrry KRZYB00P, no joy in entering my full reply


Burning_Haggis, on May 22 2018 - 03:12, said:   Anyone "optimistic" about a WG decision going in the right direction, and not just screwing the average player every chance they get, has to have a paper head.  The one constant we have seen from WG is an ability to tell us one thing, make it a 'set in stone" promise, then break said promise with no regard to the effect on just how we view their credibility.      One thing I can promise is that this will become a major factor in the purchase decision about any future premium tanks.  What is next? Sell a few super-op premiums, then "rebalance" them after the cash-flow has dwindled from them?  And why would we ever believe a single word WG said promising not to bastardize some new premium we had just bought?   Some things can't be undone once they happen, and it's a hell of allot harder to rebuild trust in a company than it is to stick by their original commitment.   Again, if the KV5's pref MM was so terrible, why was it sold in the store just over 5 months ago?   Or would WG just rather not answer that question?