Changes to Vehicles With Preferential Matchmaking + Notes on Trade-in

EmpressNero, on May 22 2018 - 02:50, said:   No, it didn't.  The article just mentioned that Wargaming wants to take the KV-5 and make it somewhat competitive in Tier 10 matches.  Which would indicate that it no longer receives preferential matchmaking.  Which, along with the rest of the article complaining about preferential tanks and how they screw with the matchmaker, indicates to me that Wargaming wants to get rid of preferential matchmaking.   Either way, you missed the point of my post.


Lethalhavoc, on May 22 2018 - 02:49, said:   The problem with that is, most were bought in the gift shop at a greatly inflated price. Before they were pulled out of the game, i bought 3 of them for $40 something dollars each.


Burning_Haggis, on May 22 2018 - 02:53, said: The truly sad part is that WG sold the KV5 when they needed a cash-cow in December, here, not even 6 months later the fools decide it was one of the major reasons tier 8 MM is broken, Good grief, talk about a company with a complete lack of forethought, or even a short-term plan.  talk about shooting yourself in the sack, this is the perfect example of that proverbial AD.   How did it go from rare tank, to cause of MM being broken?   ya, I am not believing it.  WG is just making up crap as an excuse for their jacked up failure of a MM model.   And, like that need for a cash-cow in December, they will hope everyone forgets about it soon.    T-22 med mean anything WG?  One thing we can say, without doubt, the player base seems to remember each time you shaft us.   Go find the developer that came up with this genius idea, and fire him, after all, that community college degree in janitorial services could be put to better use than it is at WG