Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era
Дата: 14.08.2012 18:47:40
ledhed14, on Aug 13 2012 - 02:52, said: MM for the things I like is great now.But I still reccomend to new players and that requires some low tier platooning.
I noticed the MM For tier three is very illogical and in some cases unworkable.
I am TRYING to sell the game to guys I know have an interest but they hit tier three and are giving up.
I used to keep at least three of ten. Active and buying into the game.
Now I keep if I am lucky one of ten.
And its because they can buy their way past tiers.
Before I reccomend more people, I have to know if this low tier mess will be adjusted and when.
Its senseless To get guts to try and quit, its a waste of time for me and them and next time I say " cone try warplanes or ships, or try again Tanks " ..If it is you will you take the chance?
Maybe a few will, but my sense is that they are older adults. They form an opinion AND it sticks.
So help me out here.
GeneralDirection: What issue are you seeing with tier 3 battles?
ApplesauceBandit, on Aug 13 2012 - 08:23, said: Is there any reason why the type 62 does not go its historical top
speed (should be 60 km/h, not 50)? Also, are there plans
to correct that?GeneralDirection: For gameplay balance, primarily. If it were a standard vehicle, we
would probably include an engine upgrade in the tech tree to reach
its historical top speed. But premium vehicles aren't balanced to
match a fully upgraded vehicle of that tier.
Otto_matic_Reiffel, on Aug 13 2012 - 13:28, said: Has Wargaming ever directly nerfed a premium tank's in game specs
once it has been released?I'm talking about stuff like less armour, not meta-game stuff like matchmaking and credit changes. There's lots of people on the forums with conspiracy theories about how badly premium tanks have been nerfed, yet strangely there are no patch notes nor actual evidence to back them up. Type 59 and Lowe are popular targets.
GeneralDirection: No, we have not made any direct nerfs to premiums outside of what
has been mentioned in update notes. As I've mentioned in other
threads, this is a case of the player base better learning how to
deal with the vehicles over time. When something is new, no one
knows the best way to take it down, but over time you learn the
strategies to do so. The Type 59 and Lowe are far less of a mystery
now than when originally introduced.
Cuth, on Aug 13 2012 - 14:42, said: Any plans for a higher tier premium SPG? If yes, what
tier/price/when can I buy it? Will earnings be similar to the
current tier 8 premiums?Barring that, any plans to let us 'premium-ize' tanks we already own by paying a similar cost to existing premiums of that tier?
GeneralDirection: Anything is possible regarding higher tier premium SPGs, but
probably not until the branches go up to tier 10. A tier 8 premium
would allow you to skip all progression in the game if released
now, and that's not the intent of premium vehicles.
_Rosco, on Aug 13 2012 - 16:24, said: I'm curious what the developers think of Assault mode in its
current state, as their seems to be alot of resentment towards it
from the majority of the community.When the mode came out, I was happy to have a change of pace and a new mode available, After 20 battles of Assault however, the strategy is the same and makes for very repetitive stagnant gameplay. Ive personally seen 4 polls that people here have voted on, that ask if it should be removed. 3 of 4 say yes.
I would like to ask the Devs to look at assault mode and maybe rework it, randomize starting points a little more or re-think it completely.
I personally, no longer care for it and seem to get it quite often.
GeneralDirection: We think Assault mode is fine for the most part. As SerB mentioned
(though it may have been taken the wrong way), the game mode is
very different from playing Standard battle. It's going to take
some time for players to formulate solid strategies for attacking
and defending. There are some problem maps, but overall we're happy
with the game mode.
hawkeyem4, on Aug 13 2012 - 16:33, said: Will there be amphibious tanks in the future?It would out even more
of some maps.GeneralDirection: Amphibious tanks don't really have a role they can fill well in
World of Tanks at the moment.
GonTo30, on Aug 14 2012 - 02:52, said: I know the t-50-2 is being removed, but I think I remember someone
saying the new tank that will replace it will have the same/similar
stats as the t-50-2. Is this correct?GeneralDirection: Yes, that is correct. The replacement tank will be one that makes a
little more sense for those attributes.
Echo_Sniper, on Aug 14 2012 - 03:40, said: GD, what's up with that TCG your planning for WoT?http://wotgenerals.com/
GeneralDirection: It's awesome? 
Official Q&A Thread: 7.5 Era