Clan Tournaments - Team Sizes
Дата: 18.01.2012 20:41:02
W0lfy, on Jan 18 2012 - 10:33, said: 15 Vs 15, with unrestricted Tiers (just like in Clan wars) sounds
like the best idea for the first inter-clan-Tournament.However there may be some issues with restricting the competition to 1 team per overall-clan, some clans (such as AOD, AOD-W, AOD-M just as examples here) use obvious names and are easily associated, however other clans (with just as close relationship as the ones mentioned) do not all have the same names so are harder to easily tell apart - which could cause contention and other issues. However if it worked (without issues) it would be good to see the 'best' players from each of the sister-clans all fighting together in the same clan-battles for a change.
GeneralDirection: Good points. I have some concerns about teams from the same clan
making some sort of agreement that determines a winner outside of
tournament rules (like playing fewer battles and then letting
technical victories trigger), but I suppose that would be easier to
police than, as you mentioned, sub-clans or sister clans that do
not have a similar name.
vanFrozit, on Jan 18 2012 - 17:12, said: I foresee some issues with this. There are tightly knit groups like
AOD and PANZACs, and there are much more loosely defined groups
with completely different names/tags. If this were Eve, it would be
an Alliance battle.Battle times will be an issue as well. If you run it during CW times, you create conflicts. If you run it at other times, all the standard issues apply. (Although this would be good for some.)
And although I voted 15v15, as I think about this timing issue, it is a lot easier to get a smaller group together than a large one. And if held during CW times, it would be a lot easier to pull out a smaller team than a full 15. Logistics. The bane of every battle....
GeneralDirection:
Clans\The Round Table\Clan Tournaments - Team Sizes