Operation wallet squeeze
Дата: 29.11.2011 00:14:49
Alpha_Mike_Foxtrot, on Nov 28 2011 - 22:48, said: when you announced "we are giving you the patton" the entire world
thought m48 because that tank was the direct opponent to the t54
durring the cold war. but contrary to this. you give us a tank
IDENTICAL TO THE TANK YOU WERE TO UPGRADE US FROM in every way
accept hp. what is the logic in that. how do you explain that THE
ONLY TANKS THAT WERE USED HEAVILY AFTER WW2 ARE ON THE RUSSIAN
LINE. You have the t54 which has upgrades that were well into
vietnam. you have an "IS7" that is directly modeled off of the T10
that was made AFTER THE FALL OF STALIN!! but the best you can come
up with is the end of the war products for the americans. im not
asking for an M60 or an abrams. Is it too much to ask for 20mm
armor upgrade on the patton for "historical reasons" after all you
did that to the is4 and it was already amazing with armor.GeneralDirection: Regarding the IS-7, it is designed based on the prototype IS-7 that
never went into production. The IS-10 (T-10) is a different tank
entirely.
As far as the Patton goes, if we decide to add tier 10 mediums (which is being considered), then that could very well be the choice for the followup to the M46. Just because we have the M46 Patton in the game, it doesn't mean it will be the only Patton in the game. If it makes sense to add the M48 to the game, then US tank fans can make their case for sure.
As far as the Patton goes, if we decide to add tier 10 mediums (which is being considered), then that could very well be the choice for the followup to the M46. Just because we have the M46 Patton in the game, it doesn't mean it will be the only Patton in the game. If it makes sense to add the M48 to the game, then US tank fans can make their case for sure.
World of Tanks Game Discussion\Suggestions\Operation wallet squeeze