Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Worst tank in the Chinese LT line?

Дата: 20.03.2022 00:15:14
View PostGrillo_Parlante, on Mar 19 2022 - 22:08, said:   It's more than sufficient DPM, and the s/p difference is significant for light tanks.  You yourself pointed out to the importance of mobility when you discussed the tier 9 and 10 in this very thread, so it's odd to see you backtracking suddenly.  Or maybe it isn't.   I know the pointlessness of trying to reason with you.  Once you settle upon one of your stat interpretations, that's all that matters to you, even if you've never played the tank, which is likely the case here (as usual).  You're still won't admit your analysis of the Kran was way off, and that is beyond ridiculous at this point.  However, I would think that you would at least have the humility to acknowledge that when your only personal wot guru has a wildly different interpretation of the tank then you, that maybe you should rethink things.  But of course, you can't.  

Draschel:  soft stats are more important than hard ones.Do you know why IS7 and FCM50 and AMXCDC are the way they are? Despite a thousand HP/T? Its because they have crippling terrain resistances, and possibly more things we don't know about such as tank gearing. Terrain resistances are more important than HP/T.  I know the pointlessness in trying to reason with you. Once you settle on your interpretation, its all that matters. You don't have a clue about what is the case or not. None of my analysis of the Kran was off. How about this, take a Kran to ranked and do well. Good for you. And take Kran to CW, and get RUTHLESSLY STOMPED by 279E and Chiefs. And see how well that is. My WZ131 has more damage than yours, but you spot more. Two different people, so any comparison is moot. Wotlabs says you still play it, while got rid of it long ago, we are talking long long long ago, 9.17 when it still had 100mm.  and for the record, we aren't talking about low DPM. We are talking about 400. Thats two shots. Only you would place this aside. 400 DPM and 20m. Do you know how major these are? For 5HP/T and 60m/s shells. Really? Thats your justifications? Holy moly guacamole, I'd hate to see your field mod choices. By the way, not even averaging 1k DPG in a tier 7 with post-HP re-balance, and post- LT MM changes, are bad. No excuses. I pulled in 1K with only a BIA crew, against Tier X in pre 9.17, and without boosted HP we see today to feed off of. Stop assessing stats? Play the game? With 400 DPM and 20m view range. https://ibb.co/WKFMDbq

Реклама | Adv