Ammoracks: Unfair RNG Component
Дата: 28.01.2022 06:04:42
         Angry_Johnny_Killbillys, on Jan 26 2022 - 20:16, said: I would think every-time I engaged a 60%er knowing he will win 100%
of the time it doesn't encourage passive play it encourages the
hell with it I am not playing at all. BS your statement was poorly
worded and frankly stupid now dig a hole to fill the one you made.
Angry_Johnny_Killbillys, on Jan 26 2022 - 20:16, said: I would think every-time I engaged a 60%er knowing he will win 100%
of the time it doesn't encourage passive play it encourages the
hell with it I am not playing at all. BS your statement was poorly
worded and frankly stupid now dig a hole to fill the one you made.Draschel:  You are full of it.When someone engages an enemy, they should
be thinking prior to, HOW to engage the enemy. On THEIR TERMS, not
the enemies. And to be mass RNGed when clearly wisdom and
advantages are used beforehand is completely ridiculous and
adds nothing to the game. Regardless of wording, when a
defender is at severe disadvantage in terms of tank type, position,
HP, Etc - then gets royally rewarded by crippling fire/ammo
rack? This is ridiculous.And on the other side, when attacker is
robbed despite playing well, in terms of taking position for their
tank type and advantage over the enemy, with clear HP
advantage..... This is silly. Ridiculous. Your argument is
moot because it doesn't address the flaw at all. 
 Angry_Johnny_Killbillys, on Jan 26 2022 - 20:50, said:
Angry_Johnny_Killbillys, on Jan 26 2022 - 20:50, said: Draschel: 
Ammoracks: Unfair RNG Component 
            













