Was the Centurion AX Always Terrible
Дата: 24.01.2022 05:25:40
Draschel: Centurion AX in public battle, is actually somewhat powerful. While
it does not have camo, DPM, turret armor of AMX30,
STB1-> it does have better more forgiving hull armor
and can trade better than STB1. And comparing it to similar gun
depression generalist like M48A Patton, it again does not have the
turret armor or DPM, but does have better camo for moving around.
It again does not have UDES turret armor and camo, or the alpha -
but at least brings to the table 330 HEAT pen. With all
these in mind, Centurion can't be considered bad. But it can't be
considered good, condemned to mediocrity. And useless in clan wars
and ranked, where too much of the game is based on having highly
coveted extremes. However, in +2/-2MM Centurion performs
well. It can be more aggressive than tanks like AMX30, M60, STB1
(flat ground) and Leopard, while still serving in sniper roles. It
has acceptable camo levels. And nice gun depression, alpha to bully
tier 8s. 410m VR, compared to 390 and 400 of many other tier X also
allow for the easier obtaining of 445m max. Allowing better gun
handling setups using ventilation and rotation mech, instead of
optics. By the way, another great buff I'd recommend
would be 420m base VR. This adds to Action Xs support
repertoire.
Was the Centurion AX Always Terrible