Was the Centurion AX Always Terrible
Дата: 24.01.2022 04:01:42
Draschel: Seriously, more and more British tanks are breaking the old
'-trend-' of copy paste 76mm LFP and 51mm side armor. Take a look
at Concept, Charlemagne, Caliban, Chimera, Super conquer, Badger,
Chieftain. And while yes, many are premiums, it doesn't make the
case and point any different. A heavy tank really should not be
like FV215B and have ridiculous low LFP and side armor, especially
since listed 215B sides are supposed to be 102mm. These old school
British tanks are easily penetrated by tier 6 nevermind tier
8. The same goes for American heavy tanks. Take a look at
side armor profile of T110E5, 110E4, M103. And take a look at
the far more comfortable, forgiving and newer profile of AE Phase.
Look at Somua, and look at AMX49,51,54. WG needs to bury this
nonsense, of only giving Chinese, Russian, or super heavy tanks
reasonable side armor - or take it away from Russian, Chinese tanks
and ONLY HAVE IT with super heavy tanks.
Was the Centurion AX Always Terrible