Game has nothing to do with your skill

Draschel:  It really does not depend on *'which tank'* And by that, apparently only 1 tank you have chosen. But from what I see, he is clearly doing better in all parameters, you simply dodge it in with a specified tank. He has 18 tanks with population variance, of over 70 battles. I wouldn't say 70 battles is enough, but lets settle on that number being enough because that number works for you too. You have 5 tanks at that level, too. Now, of these 18 tanks -> 50.6% W/R is his lowest, 65.2 is his highest.                                       -> 2,240 DPG is his lowest, 3,010 DPG is his highest.                                      -> He has 2 with 2-marks, safe to say his combined totals are probably higherNow of these 5 tanks   -> 50% W/R is the lowest, 61.7 is the highest                                    -> 2,050 DPG the lowest, 2,800 DPG the highest.                                    -> None yet beyond 1-markYour T57 is an singular outlier. And in this situation, only clearly works to your advantage directly contrasting his. Not only is it your BEST tier X, it alone only proves what you are trying to say. He has more tanks in the 56,57,58,59,60 range, while you only have 1. While damage isn't everything, the differentiation here is significant. His LOWEST DPG T-X used here, is higher than all but your BEST DPG.....meaning his lowest T-X is better than your 2nd best. Any WoT self respecting analytic can come by and draw up the same conclusions. You two are different tiered players, different strata. No offense needed, its a break down.   You need to drop the train of thought, that wins mean everything. They do not. Just slam on the brakes. Wins are great, sure. But acquiring the results which tend to be benefactor to wins, are more important than wins themselves.