Дата: 25.10.2021 07:15:55
Fray_Bentos_Lite, on Oct 24 2021 - 20:05, said: Wow. 2 shadow account posters. Maybe Draschel posting twice. LOL.
Draschel: You zero in on accountability. The problem with that is, when accountability is actually seen, for example when someone good posts a retort - you clearly see it but dismiss it and make other excuses.This is hypocrisy. It is defeatism. Another thing, there is a difference between pointing out how someone does, and insulting someone when looking at results. To say someone plays sub-par compared to averages, or may lack required skills to more commonly see success.......is FAR DIFFERENT, than to say something like, "You suck, GTFO noobsack, UNINSTALL." You see the difference here? One is pointing out something without a bias, merely an observation, the other is clearly badgering. I don't attack ratings. You need to know the difference. I mention ongoing sub-par performance, which leads to the rating, which explains alot of issues piloting certain vehicles. FV4005 is a high skill cap tank. On top of that, it is a very RNG dependent tank. Stacked things that weigh against someone that does pretty much what you do. Enough said. HE mostly results in superficial damage to tanks. While that may render tanks inoperable, or have them abandoned -- its clearly not lethal in nature. Stuff like damaged radios and phones, damaged co-ax and roof HMG, damaged gun barrel, damaged suspension. But it don't perforate tanks and catastrophically blow them sky high. While it -can- and it has/does happen seldom, the ordnance rate expenditure VS destruction ratio achieved is extremely high and incredibly inefficient. World of tanks had it ridiculously in HE favor, where HE was incredibly lethal. https://www.wotgarag.../45057/su-130pmhttps://skill4ltu.eu/45057/su-130-pm/Your collective results for SU130PM are lower than average.