Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Italian heavy line

Дата: 12.09.2021 06:48:18
View Postchurchill50, on Sep 12 2021 - 02:01, said: The Rhinoceronte..... as bad as everyone says. Alpha is all it has. 

Draschel:  It will be due for a fixing. Like how they fixed IS4 terrible movement/traverse dispersion. The only question is:  will they nerf bat the accuracy too like they did with IS4 and E100 What I do not understand is the pitiful, pathetic DPM.  Looking at Vz 55, ST-II, 50B, Kran van, T57 -> what exactly is the issue with this tank DPM. If it is going to have extremely derpshot dispersion values. worse than T57....why doesn't it have DPM like T57. To balance it out into a close range brawler. Why give a tank 0.33 accuracy, 2s aim-time to extraordinarily punish it with woeful, counter balancing dispersion as bad as Grille? Still after 10 long years, war gaming refuses to let go of knee-capping tanks and their stats and proper representing them. I understand the Horn, and it is good for WG to implement weakness. But why make it so weak tier 8 light tank with AP can penetrate it. How come russian tanks don't have weakspots like that. Looking at a usual cupola weakspot, T62A or ST-I, still 225-245mm. Not 185. And what is with the belt of 40mm side armor, great job WG. Get over matched by everyone and their mom, with 122. What is the point of that. They couldn't even give it 55, like the Horn sides?  Change the horn to 150mm, still a legitimate weakness, but not fodder.Side armor of the tank all listed 75mm. Remove drop to 40mmDispersion of traverse and movement lowered to 0.24. Still bad but better. 

Реклама | Adv