What's wrong with arty?
Дата: 06.09.2021 02:30:59
ATruk, on Sep 05 2021 - 15:23, said: So there is arti that is not 3-marked? Why isn't everyone 3-marking
this easy arti? Do reasonable? What is that? I would say those that
can play tanks well can also play arti well. Those that cannot play
tanks well cannot play arti well.Draschel: I didn't say arta were easy to 3-mark. I said arta were easy
to play.Easy to play ==/== easy to 3-mark. Do you know what 3-mark
is defined as?Imagine this, scrub who is hopeless, does 1-2 shots
of damage, maybe spots/tracks 20% HP worth.All of a sudden,
the same scrub ends up doing A) 5 shots of damage
B) 4x their HP worth of combined in an artaYou see the
stark differences here? Obviously that isn't enough for 3-mark, but
is considerably more an achievement than the guy in a
tank
ATruk, on Sep 05 2021 - 15:47, said: http://forum.worldof...4#entry12890164
Yet you persist in saying otherwise. Why?Draschel: False representation of obsolete, never catered tech tree
windows. T-46-5 never existed, branches out from AT1? Yet has been
on display since 2012. You are using falsified tech trees, or
envisioned things never coming into fruition.If what you have to
post, shows arty released at a date tier 9 TD like Jag Tiger and
704 are released - obviously gameplay existed before, WITHOUT arty,
with tiered normal tanks and tiers 2-8 TD. Doesn't make
sense. You persist though in disagreeing, why?
What's wrong with arty?