What's wrong with arty?
Дата: 05.09.2021 11:52:34
2Fantastic, on Sep 05 2021 - 08:41, said: I mean if you play arty it straight up burns your stats alive. So I
don’t think it would be even a possibility that an arty main could
have “credibility”. And just because somebody is good at the game
doesn’t mean they know what’s best. In the end the only tanks that
will deserve any respect will be heavy and medium tanks.This would allow arty to both brawl/trade hp and be more more consistent.
Draschel: Of course it is possible to have reputable stats and play
artillery, and confer credibility. Take a look at Tinyguan from
LYB, 3-marked GC and M53/55 in 1K battles. Playing well is
playing well. But playing for WN8 and DPG are different.Being great
at the game, does not mean the person knows what is best. For sure.
But by best, subjectively what is your take on that? Best as
in....at what? Equality? Balance? Performance? Realism?Just make
artillery TDs. Problem solved. What is the difference between Wespe
that is made a TD compared to T40 with 105mm? None. What is
the difference between lefhB2 made a TD and Stug II with 105?
None.Buff HP, buff VR, reduce their dispersion/aim-time, increase
accuracy. SPG with new penetration rounds, those become the premium
ammo. No one loses their work, crews, exp. There you go, problem
solved.
What's wrong with arty?