What do people mean by "Pay to Win"?
Дата: 22.08.2021 10:29:14
Angry_Johnny_Killbillys, on Aug 22 2021 - 04:01, said: This well written paragraph seems logical an has all the points to prove an argument. Except it isn't correct. Myself an numerous other people I have known in the game have two accounts. One Pay to progress and one FTP. There is a tiny fraction of a difference in any stats on either one of mine an its typical of the others. The only difference is amount of time to progress. The skill level is obviously the same.
Draschel: You are delusional, and incorrect. Show someone
with 1,000 battles in object 260. And 1,000 battles in IS7. See who
is performing betterThen use 1,000 battles in chieftain, and 1,000
battles in super conqueror.Next, use 1,000 battles in LT432, and
1,000 in LTTB. How about EBR75, and Lynx. A free to play
account, can still have an unusually highly skilled player behind
it, and said player can still pay for the definite edges in battle
incorporating things as premium ammunition and
large consumables. And that exact player, could have also
grinded out 14day marathons for great tanks like T44100, LIS,
Renegade, SU130PM, Etc. Such a player, would also work towards
279E, 260, and could be a part of a clan to win stuff like VK7201
and 907. With this dedication in mind, yes the player is more or
less as skilled as any great paying player - but his work is harder
on him because a lack of extra earned convenience, But this
all isn't the point. The point is, the rule of average, what we can
see over populations, not individuals. Someone who pays has a
battlefield advantage over those that don't. Not all players,
actually very very very very few do, follow the model of the one I
described as above, or has the time available. Using the average NA
tank player data, such a player has a striking advantage if they
pay, over another average player that doesn't
What do people mean by "Pay to Win"?