Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Can we please go back to when arty was nerfed...

Дата: 03.08.2021 02:23:50
View PostEdselman, on Aug 02 2021 - 23:35, said: KV-2 with the 107mm is not a good tank, the 152mm derp was what made it. Yes, it does get slightly better dpm than the T-150, but it is slower, a bigger target, and had weaker armor. A 107mm-armed KV-2 is easily weaker than both the T-150 and KV-85. 

Draschel:  KV2 is a fine tank. It depends who drives it. But this isn't a debate on whats good or bad. If it were, no one would ever play a great many tanks across lots of the tiers, simply because tank A exists considerably better than tank B. I like 113 and 121. They are perfectly fine, in achieving 3.5K  DPG, I can sit at that sum for a session. But why would someone torture themselves with that, when you could do it with Chieftain, 260, 430U?This isn't a comparative debate. This is a debunking of:  **KV2 sucks**  No, KV2 does not suck because the 152 still works and 107 works.  T49 does not suck. Because the 90mm is still just fine on it.  No SU152 does not suck, because you can still make the 152  work  or use the rapid fire 122mm. No,  oho doesn't suck because the 105mm is fine.  But does the oho actually, as a tank suck because Defender, Kresl, KV4, VK100 01, AMX M4 49, 112 exist and are all better super heavy tanks? Yes. But that isn't what we are asking. 

Реклама | Adv