hesh ammo,

Draschel:  If all a 48.5% W/R player decided to shoot, over the next 2,500 battles that the person would play, were premium shells especially APCR  (HEAT has some faults)  so say Leopard, Super Conqueror, Progetto 46, T110E4. Yes, their stats would increase. But such a person and their incoming increase, would be like to 50,  51% tops. Just because they are now penetrating a greater portion of their shots, don't make them a 60% winning player. I am not against the proposition, of nerfing premium ammunition. But a few things first to consider, everyone has access to it. It is not exclusive to one camp of players. If a premium ammunition nerf were to be set in place, equally alongside it at the SAME TIME, heavy tank / assault medium / assault TD armor models need proper implementation  (AKA 2010-2013 design) of weakspots. Remember when IS3 didn't have the UFP 130mm moustache? Lower plate was 100? When soviet turret roof were casually set 20-30mm, now one by one becoming 55mm? See where we are going?  And designs like Chrysler, Object 268 V 4, TS5, continually buffed Maus? You get the point. Heavy designs, should be like VK7501, AMX AC48 mle, Tiger II, Kreslavsky, Etc. Hardened armor in large portions of the tank, but dedicated weak spots that can be aimed at. Weakspots shouldn't be like 430U, T62A, Type 5 cupolas. This is the single most important feature which must accompany premium ammo changes. If the ammo changes, models like Maus, Badger, Type 5 must be changed too at that point of time. Tertiary, people better be prepared for an icnrease in AP cost too. Lower the premium cost, lower the HE cost, increase the AP cost (of course not to premiums current rate)  Lets look at Chimera and 50 TP Proto.440/440/530 @755/4800/705 changes to  450/420/550 @900/1100/700440/440/560 @880/4800/720 changes to  440/400/560 @1000/1250/700  This is whats called balance. Not the automatic, gang-saying, nerve racked "DUDE NERF PREM, PREM OP"  You see how this works?