A43, KV2, T150

Draschel: I did not say OI needed buffing. I just said it was nerfed, and KV2 hasn't been, because WG is unwilling to change KV2R. And because they aren't willing to change KV2R, they are buffing it, and hence buff KV2 as well. Does KV2 need a buff?  Wait, what? Did you just say tanks like Schmulturm, AC4, Fury, Loza are fine?  Please, tell me you didn't write that. Who said anything about super mobile. I just want SOME mobility. Not 60 tonne heavy tank med mobility, in a tank actually 30 tonnes. I mean seriously, they gave Anhou the 440 horsepower engine. Why the heck not give it to deserving tanks too, like Schmulturm and Stug IV.  +1.5HP/T won't be something you pick up on as a huge change, like tanks with huge amounts of inherit engine power, like a CDC or LT432 or E25. But on a tank that needs it? A tank that can use it and benefits, it will be noticeable. My 121 mobility, is vastly different, with +1.75HP/T.  IS7 drives considerably different, with the engine buffs, +1.5HP/T.  Object 268 V 4, it is the opposite. It feels quite a deal slower, with the engine nerf. STG guard is considerably different, same with Super Pershing, with their engine changes. So will 59 Patton with its planned engine buff. What you are basically saying, is turbo charger doesn't help. Because the horsepower it provides, is meaningless. It won't matter,  lol.  On a pudel or Bretagne, in +% boost slot, dude its +1.5HP/T I can't take you seriously.  AT15, Tortoise, old FV183, new FV4005, Badger all have comfortable, wide gun arc. The a great asset of them being useful in corridor maps, as assault guns, are because of wide gun arc. Jag panther, Ferdinand, Jag Tiger used to be above average, with 12 / 15 / 10 because many TD had bad gun traverse, 5-10 deg. That changed with the 263 line getting boosted. ISU now getting boosted. French ones getting boosted. If something like Ferdinand, ever had an advantage of wide gun arc, its just average now. Whereas things like SU101, 263 may have had them as faults before, they have been evened out to average. Who gets s--- on here?  Not RUSHA, that much is true WZ120G has the gun of a tier 10 medium, and the DPM isn't like that of a tier 8 medium  (Kanonen 105 and AMXCDA)  SU130PM and Skorpion and Charioteer have tier 10 guns, and even turrets.....and still don't have the DPM of a miserable tier 8 medium. When AMX mle 48 did not have an auto loader, its AMX50B  120mm was single shot, again the DPM wasn't anemic. And it is a tier 10 gun. Same with Jag Panther II. Should I even mention TS5  DPM? S1.  There is a trend here. CDA and Kanonen 105 need DPM adjustment. I am not saying give them WZ120G  DPM, but 2,300-2,400 range,  like S1  is just fine. That is 10 %, and by no means does this make them powerful. These tanks also have considerably bad dispersion stats too. Meaning their actual aim-time, accuracy maybe good,  but are plagued by terrible .21 and .23 dispersion stats making their supposed gun handling a myth. Compare those dispersion rates with TS5, WZ120G.......250 HEAT is bad for a tier 8 TD. 250 HEAT is even worse, non-sensical, when you have 238 AP pen. There is actually, virtually no point in it.  STA2, M56 have similar low pressure HEAT guns, give it 275 HEAT like them.  I didn't compare the two TD to SU12244. I compared them to WZ120G, which compares similarly to SU12244. Read.  Why not? Tier 6 can get 1-shot by TD with 750 alpha. You think 420 is scary? By the way, Borsig and ISU that 1-shot tier 6s with 750 alpha are also camo, campy TD with higher DPM,  lol.  I have no problem with WG adjusting CDA and Kanonen 105 to 2,300 - 2,400 DPM range, giving 105  Leopards 420 alpha won't change too much, it isn't game breaking. S1, WZ120G, SU130PM, Charioteer, Skorpion still are a tonne better.   Because something is in Tier 9, doesn't make it a tier 9 hull. What kind of remark is that?  I would not even call Tiger II, with buffed 160mm suitable in tier 9 because of its slowness. VK4502A hull is effectively 235mm AP, by the way, and I think that is suitable for a  super heavy tier 8. Not tier 9. Where do you come up with this?  150mm with its slope, effectively 210 vs AP. Like a T54, sure that is nice for a dynamic medium. But a slow large heavy? You are right, Tiger II doesn't need a 160mm Glacis. It needs an 170mm glacis, 130mm LFP. 90mm side plate. Then it can actually attempt at being an appropriate tank. VK4502A the speedy tank, Tiger II the middle ground,  VK100P the superheavy.  You make me laugh. You are a blue, trapped in 2013. Don't take this the wrong way, not calling you bad. You obviously aren't. There is a disconnect, where you aren't truly envisioning the game, a peak. Stuck in 5th gear and won't rev to 6th. Where and when people are now punching out 3k +, 3.5k even, dare I say the gents in top 3 content with 4k....you seem fine still with your wondrous 2.3k. Nice. Like, for reals champ, drive a chieftain and 260...... and do what people do in Tier 9 Conqueror. Real nice. And I don't know if it took you actually 1,700 BP for that Cent 7/1 3MoE, but here is the way its done right, 3 years ago, with the 20lb gun because I think its better than L7 and was unwilling to spend the free experienchttps://ibb.co/McT7Jj2