Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?

Draschel:  This makes no sense at all. And you make no sense at all. You are trying to act wise by spouting gibberish, and it is just that. Gibberish. Yes, there are winners and there are losers. And yes, for every 1 game, there is either winner, loser, draw. But when you separate games played, into more accurately players playing games - players are each different, they are not regulated into a 3 slot outcome of..... winning, losing, draws. Why is that, because 1 individual player can play 1 game, 2 games, 3 games, 4 games, 5 games - to 75,000 games. It is infinite in possibility, incalculable for your dumb train of thought. So while yes, there are only stringent, specified outcomes of a battle, to be placed in 3 categories, and only 3 - we don't know how many individual instances of these three categories there may be. You obviously have no grip on sample / population statistics. So yes, the game will result in a party winning, losing, drawing - but how many instances of this do we have? Incalculable. The person that wins, and the other side loses - may play 1,000 times. The person that loses, and the other side wins, may play 15 times. Who knows.  Everyone will not be at 50%. You just answered your own question. Do you know how stupid you just made yourself seem? This isn't about super bowl rings. This is about W/R or Win / Loss rate. And Dan Marino? Joe Montana? Brett Favre? We are talking about pigskin tossers, who all have 60%+ W/R career long. What kind of an example is that. You don't know about statistics. You don't know about interpretation. You don't know about delivery. And it plainly explains the things connected with your performance.