Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?

Draschel:  What gives you the right to judge? Because others judge you? Well if that is the case, every conversation you have must be defensive and toxic at the start. Terrible attitude. How about you reading the reverse, of:"I think the BIG problem with SBMM is that for most players in the majority lower skilled and performing group, almost exclusively amongst their peers will mean that Win Rates will increase. along with their damages and others. Stats for free, that they didn't try any harder for or earn, or learn. Stats are going to increase and boy boy boy, will these newly entitled kids even know what has happened?" Your argument of competitiveness fails, because the exact reversal in casualness is the same. The only argument here are:-ranked exists and seems to be what is wanted in a skill venue. Use it. -No one should be getting anything without the due effort. Try harder-Equality. Every man woman and child deserves to be treated the same-Wait times. Having to deal with longer wait times will annoy most. 

Draschel:  Bad people complain too. In fact, by using population variance, it seems very logical they complain more. The only fools here are those that want an easier environment, and results from that environment - that they don't genuinely earn. They want easy street. And they too complain about itYou want to hear about the 40% crowd and their complaints? About them not understanding map choke points? Why they lose, to begin with? How they still don't understand bushes and camo after tens of thousands of games? How they attribute blame rather on themselves, but the opposing noob shooting premium at them instead? About the noob tanks they play, to harass others in weaker tanks? Yes, sure, that's the issue. You are not alone, there are many toxic and intolerable out there like you. I'd recommend an attitude change. You would be surprised with the results. And would it benefit me? Of course not, what is that to me. But it would benefit you.