Senlac,M41D,ISU130 looking good. T92 still looks trash.

Draschel: Unfortunately, no. The aim-time doesn't. Many things have excellent aim-times, but are totally let down by dispersion stats. But most things with exceptional dispersion, despite a lower accuracy and aim-time genuinely have reputation of good gun handling. We call this the 430U and IS7 syndrome. That is why AMX CDA is generally better than it, though it is too good either.  T92 has the unique property, of rocking back and forth. Which not only influences aiming, but driving too. That along with it's lower top speed, nearly 10%. That is like a free supercharger. It balances out the track traverse and terrain types.I am not saying it has to spam premium rounds, and definitely superior normalization with 189 pen is better than less normalization and 175 - but that any self respecting driver does that. At least in random battle, if you are in SH or FL, I guess AP can work more commonly. Also, any self respecting person not being able to use 1, 020m/s is also seemingly very suspect indeed. I'd compare Senlac to WZ132 or HK30, before comparing it to the bottom of the barrel like T92 and Elc. Being 3 tonnes heavier and having 50 HP means you resist ramming far more too.