Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Дата: 02.08.2021 01:58:16
Siege_Engine, on Aug 01 2021 - 23:51, said: I think the objective of this debate has been lost.
We are going around in a circle debating in a vacuum.
Let's please go back to the objective. The
objective is to have fun. One perception is that random*
MM results in too many unavoidable outcomes -- due to
random* combined skill imbalances between the two teams.
This is not fun. Another perception is that
random* MM is fine. If there are unavoidable outcomes in
battles, that is good because it's random* MM.
Have you ever presented any statistical proof, of this, either
way? I don't think so? However, there
is expert testimony that says yes, "There are too many
unavoidable outcomes due to skill imbalances between the two
teams. And that's not fun." I haven't seen any
statistical proofs that rebuke that statement.
DeviouslyCursed, on Aug 01 2021 - 16:50, said: "Expert testimony."
DeviouslyCursed: aaaaaaaaand again.
DeviouslyCursed, on Aug 01 2021 - 16:50, said: "Expert testimony."
DeviouslyCursed:
Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?