Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Дата: 30.07.2021 08:08:45
SimplyPzB2, on Jul 30 2021 - 05:14, said: Neatos most recent data shows that unicums will still manage 58% win rates under sbmm. And 'real' unicums would much rather have a 59% win rate beating equal opponents than a 65% win rate beating up on noobs... - - Because it takes more skill to beat an equal opponent, than it does to beat a lesser opponent. So a 55% win rate in sbmm, is better than a 65% win rate in random mm. Duh... - -
But sbmm doesn't "decouple" anything. It eliminates the auto-losses, and auto-wins -- the battles where individual skill means nothing. - sbmm means bringing your A-game to every battle is important. - -
blah blah blah, "balanced battles will be bad"... failing to realize about 40% of all your battle RIGHT NOW are balanced. Yet we've yet to see anyone make a topic complaining about all the balanced battles they've played. Not a single screenshot of both teams having six good players, and someone crying about it.. - - look up at the screenshot a few posts above. That game sucked. So yeah, it's REAL that balanced gameplay is better gameplay. - -
DeviouslyCursed: Dude, just admit you can't handle the challenge of playing a
hard to win fight. Being the sole green in that screenshot scares
you so bad you have to platoon up all the time to avoid it. And you
want SBMM so you will never have to face one. Poor, scared
little man. And man, he's posting up a storm. Mommy must have
ungrounded him and let him back on the internet.
Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?