Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Дата: 28.07.2021 21:06:18

Without a doubt Neato, you have an excellent command of numbers and are pretty good with spreadsheets and all that. You also have a dog in this fight so to speak and your bias is clear especially considering the loose editorial comments you make about people who disagree.
At the end of the day, i don't think you really influence anyone beyond those already convinced. This is after a TON of effort. The problem is that a lot of people see match after match right in front of them and they "feel" something isn't right. "Fairness" is basically a values concept and no amount of numbers you've thrown at it cut into the belief something isn't right. Telling them to in essence not look at it, doesn't seem like convincing argument either. Being angry that folks don't "believe" isn't working either.
Like it or not, a LOT of things in life, especially sports and similar contests that are primarily entertainment, must confront human feelings of fairplay and do so successfully. People see that, know that and ask why Wargaming can't do the same. That is why this goes on and on.
DeviouslyCursed: Getting a little tired of this guy constantly trying to
invalidate all of math, statistics, and the scientific method
because all of it has to be done by humans, then in the next
sentence states we have to directly address the impressions of
others that are based entirely on ignorance, logical fallacies, and
psychological errors. How exactly would one address their
"impressions" btw? Oh, I don't know.... maybe evidence? You know,
those math-y and statistic-y things we've been using. Numbers? OMG
not the numbers! If Neato's conclusions are biased,
specifically point out the bias and show the proper
conclusions. All I see you doing is the same thing the "it's
rigged" people do: make an assertion, then provide no
evidence. If he is biased, you should be able to show what
conclusion was biased, and then show the proper conclusion.
Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?