Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Дата: 15.07.2021 03:52:55
SimplyPzB2, on Jul 14 2021 - 23:20, said: It's sad when people resort to lying, rather than admitting they
are wrong. Look up one post to see the screenshot of one of
my battles. The battle was clearly rigged by the random
mm. But it had nothing to do with my platoon. The fact
that I was in a platoon had ZERO effect on how badly that battle
was unbalanced. DeviouslyCursed:
SimplyPzB2, on Jul 14 2021 - 23:21, said: No, go on, tell us all how my two-man green-skilled platoon made the sample battle unbalanced...
DeviouslyCursed: By including a green partner, you guarantee that one spot on
your team is a green rather than a random teammate. A random
teammate could be anything, but is likely to be an orange or yellow
player, with about a 48% win rate. Also, the MM tends to match
# of platoons, so if you had not been platooned, the horrible enemy
platoon of orange 44% and 47% players likely would not have been in
the fight. Instead they would be replaced by random players, and
while no guarantee, they likely would have been better players than
what was there. So by platooning with a good player you set 1
good player on your team, and 2 really bad players on the other
team. So yes, your platoon made the match even more skewed than it
would have been. This is very easy to understand, so it
doesn't surprise me that it is beyond you...
Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?