Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?
Дата: 12.07.2021 04:16:48

Actually, most of my tier 9 and 10 tanks have 60% win rates. (Not all, just most). - And again with the fallacy that "if we're all treated poorly" it's fair. Here's a picture for you. Tell me how fair it was to the lone good player on team 2..
DeviouslyCursed: Your most played tier 10 (by far, 742 battles) has 50% win
rate and 1646 DPG. And your second most (at 341 battles has more
than the 5 remaining tier 10s combined) has 48% win rate and 1623
DPG. Yes yes, I know you're really proud of being hard carried
by your platoonmates in your tier 10s. With under 2K average damage
if you played solo you'd be well under 50%. And 39K battles
and only about 1250 are tier 10, you shouldn't be talking smack to
anyone about playing lower tiers. As for your picture,
I'm perfectly fine with being the solo green on the enemy team.
Those matches don't bother me at all. If I lose, oh well. If I win,
it's hilarious and smack talking time to the other team (when I had
xvm, I don't use it now).
Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?