Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?

SimplyPzB2, on May 26 2021 - 04:23, said: wow, these responses show just how wrong dc is, and how weak he is that he can't accept how wrong he is.  pathetic. - He shows two quotes from me talking about purple players.  These were from separate conversations.  But he clips them together.  pathetic.   Someone has said purple players don't play stock tanks.  I gave 'youtube contributor' examples.   Obviously, those youtube guys don't play stock tanks ALL THE TIME.  Which is what I was saying in my second comment on the subject,  no purple players sit around and drive nothing but stock tanks.   hurp durr..


SimplyPzB2, on May 19 2021 - 19:43, said: This morons is still wrong.  A platoon doesn't pick the teams.  Thus a platoon CAN'T BE responsible for unbalanced teams.  Hurp durr...   Sbmm can balance teams, including teams with platoons...  
My response was a data set that clearly showed that has the chance to win moved away from 50%, the outcomes became increasingly more 'guaranteed'.  By definition, a game with a guaranteed outcome is no game at all.  hurp durr...  
garbage post.  For one thing, a purple player in a stock tank CAN beat a purple player in a pimped tank.  No two players are 'exactly' equal.  And in any given battle, any purple player can out play another. - What you are 100% wrong on is your position that 'stock' vs 'pimped' has any meaningful significance.  Look at skll4u, or quickybaby..  they've both featured videos of them playing stock tanks and crushing the enemy team.   Additionally, just how many purple players do you know that drive stock tanks?  The answer is zero.  So your little fake scenario of a purple in a stock tank vs a purple in a pimped tank is just stupid. - random mm has serious issues, the biggest being that is allows for unbalanced battles to exist.  sbmm does not allow unbalanced battles to exist, so there are no issues with it. - And my god you are stupid.   Because sbmm creates balanced teams, it CAN'T punish anyone by giving them better/worse teammates.   Because both teams are equal, neither team has a built in disadvantage/advantage...     seek therapy bro..   Did you really just ask HOW THE WG COMPUTER WOULD KNOW the skill of the players?   Dam that is a stupid statement.  The anomizer means WE can't see a players info.  The COMPUTER can ALWAYS see a players info.   dmbazz.   - and omg, did you just say people will 'game the sbmm'?  really?  So they will intentionally lose 10 battles so than can get 1 good mm?  stupid statement..     sbmm does NOT treat players differently.  It treats all players the same.  It balances skill between teams.  100% fair. - bold text - exactly.  Sbmm eliminates the MATCHMAKER from giving a built in advantage to good players, and a built in disadvantage to bad players.  All battles should be between equal teams.   No one ever said 'hey, tom brady is good, lets' lets him play a few college teams because he is so good'.  Nope, they make him play against pro teams  every single game.   -