Дата: 22.05.2021 06:05:36
ElDerpomatic, on May 21 2021 - 22:29, said: You need to stop drinking WG's grape cool aid. All players do
NOT have the same opportunity to win. How can it be a players
actions that give an advantage/disadvantage when the team
composition is nowhere close to being balanced? I'll give you
a couple examples from a couple months ago. In one tier
9-10 game my teams heavies consisted of a Kranvagn and an ST-II
while the other teams heavies were both Chieftans (not platooned
together). That right there is a disadvantage before the game
even starts. In a tier 6 game my team's heavies were both
KV-2®'s while the other teams heavies were both O-I's. Both
of our KV-2®'s were destroyed by the O-I's, neither of which took
any damage during the game. There is no advantage for the
teams I was on in both examples. We lost both of those games
13-0 and 15-0. I can only imagine you are going to argue that
the examples I gave do not prove a disadvantage, and anyone who can
conclude that clearly either A) Works for WG, B) Has little to no
actual understanding of how broken MM is, or C) Both A and B.
DeviouslyCursed: I never said that Random MM doesn't give battles that are
skewed, I said that over time we all get the equivalent
battles/teammates. Everyone gets some battles that are extremely
unlikely to win. Everyone gets battles that are extremely likely to
win. So yes, everyone has the same opportunity to win the same
amount of battles under Random MM. The only difference is some
people can rise to the occasion more often than others. This is
fair. It allows players who contribute more, to win more, all based
on their ability to contribute to their teams.