Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Proof SBMM is Unfair

Дата: 22.05.2021 06:05:36
View PostElDerpomatic, on May 21 2021 - 22:29, said: You need to stop drinking WG's grape cool aid.  All players do NOT have the same opportunity to win.  How can it be a players actions that give an advantage/disadvantage when the team composition is nowhere close to being balanced?  I'll give you a couple examples from a couple months ago.  In one tier 9-10 game my teams heavies consisted of a Kranvagn and an ST-II while the other teams heavies were both Chieftans (not platooned together).  That right there is a disadvantage before the game even starts.  In a tier 6 game my team's heavies were both KV-2®'s while the other teams heavies were both O-I's.  Both of our KV-2®'s were destroyed by the O-I's, neither of which took any damage during the game.   There is no advantage for the teams I was on in both examples.  We lost both of those games 13-0 and 15-0.  I can only imagine you are going to argue that the examples I gave do not prove a disadvantage, and anyone who can conclude that clearly either A) Works for WG, B) Has little to no actual understanding of how broken MM is, or C) Both A and B.

DeviouslyCursed:  I never said that Random MM doesn't give battles that are skewed, I said that over time we all get the equivalent battles/teammates. Everyone gets some battles that are extremely unlikely to win. Everyone gets battles that are extremely likely to win. So yes, everyone has the same opportunity to win the same amount of battles under Random MM. The only difference is some people can rise to the occasion more often than others. This is fair. It allows players who contribute more, to win more, all based on their ability to contribute to their teams.  

Реклама | Adv