Реклама | Adv
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
  • Rotator
Сообщения форума
Реклама | Adv

Why do Some Argue Against Skill Based MM?

Дата: 20.05.2021 04:28:39
View PostSimplyPzB2, on May 19 2021 - 19:43, said: garbage post.  For one thing, a purple player in a stock tank CAN beat a purple player in a pimped tank.  No two players are 'exactly' equal.  And in any given battle, any purple player can out play another.
  - What you are 100% wrong on is your position that 'stock' vs 'pimped' has any meaningful significance.  Look at skll4u, or quickybaby..  they've both featured videos of them playing stock tanks and crushing the enemy team.   Additionally, just how many purple players do you know that drive stock tanks?  The answer is zero.  So your little fake scenario of a purple in a stock tank vs a purple in a pimped tank is just stupid. - random mm has serious issues, the biggest being that is allows for unbalanced battles to exist.  sbmm does not allow unbalanced battles to exist, so there are no issues with it. - And my god you are stupid.   Because sbmm creates balanced teams, it CAN'T punish anyone by giving them better/worse teammates.   Because both teams are equal, neither team has a built in disadvantage/advantage...     seek therapy bro..

DeviouslyCursed:  Well, it's official. We broke SimplyPzB2. He can't even go a whole paragraph without contradicting himself now. SimplyPzB2: "just how many purple players do you know that drive stock tanks?  The answer is zero."SimplyPzB2:  provides two examples of purples playing stock tanks... And why do purples generally avoid stock tanks? Because everyone knows they would be fighting at a disadvantage. You once again prove my concern valid. Thanks. Keep talking, because more support for how crappy a SBMM system is... always welcome. And come on, how mentally disabled do you have to be to not realize that your position is: "yes SBMM discriminates by giving better players worse teammates, and worse players better teammates, but it does so to provide balanced matches, so I feel that the pros outweigh the cons"? Are you not mature enough to admit this? How pathetically juvenile does one have to be to just keep denying the negatives? Is your position that precarious, your supports so weak, your positives so worthless, that you can't acknowledge a negative? Really? Lets try this, in a really, really simple manner. Are these two sets of teammates equal? teammates  team 1           team 2purple           2                    3red               12                  11  

Реклама | Adv